Fethullah Gülen Difference
"Some are harsh in their defense of secularism; others attack secularism and democracy unjustly. Secularism has not been in danger to date, and I don't believe that it will be endangered in the future either.
"I didn't find the 8-year uninterrupted education system dangerous, as others did. The issue of whether it should be uninterrupted or not can be settled by consensus.
"As Turkish society has not yet proven its maturity and fully digested democracy, a crisis is occurring. The republic and democracy comprise the foundation for the continuation of Islamic thought. It's a mistake to interpret them as being opposed to Islam.
"In religion, 95 percent deals with belief; 5 percent deals with rules."
Gülen wants to bring secularists and antisecularists, who have been artificially separated on this issue, together on common ground. He says: "Secularism should not be an obstacle to religious devoutness, nor should devoutness constitute a danger to secularism." If I understand this correctly, this is Fethullah Hodja's aim.
The biggest difficulty being experienced in Turkey, or any Muslim society that wants to politicize Islam, is this the "conflict between secularism and antisecularism."Suleyman Yagiz, Takvim daily, 4/18/97
- Created on .